In the article “Developing Sustainable
Infrastructure in New Cities”, Cho (2014) mentions that enhanced
infrastructural development is vital in considering the economic, social and
environmental issues in cities. She
further asserts that the key factor of a nation’s competitiveness to unite
cities is by having sustainable and competent infrastructure. While emphasizing
the goal to achieve sustainable infrastructural development, the writer
explains about the Envision Rating System. The rating system is a tool to
evaluate the performance of an infrastructure,
particularly for its sustainability. Cho mentions about her involvement in the
King Abdullah Economic City (KAEC) project that would bring a positive impact
to the Saudis in the future. The writer believes that infrastructure must
improve the aspect of life of the society while preserving energy resources as
well as considering the natural environment and climate change.
I agree with Cho that both government and the
private sector need to agree on sustainability. However, she fails to explain
that approaches for policies, strategies and projects from the government that
is important for sustainable development while considering the economic, social
and environmental issues.
Clark (2012) reports that “effective governance is a prerequisite for
putting in place the integrated policymaking capacity which is needed to drive
sustainable development.” To demonstrate good decision making towards
sustainable development, the same author uses Singapore as an example.
Singapore has set up a plan called the “sustainable development blueprint,” which involves all relevant
ministries to analyze urban problems and the ways to manage these. Personally,
I feel that the sustainable
Singapore blueprint project
signifies a great effort by the Singapore government to further instill a
positive mindset of the public and private sectors towards sustainable
development.
For example, Singapore
was awarded the intelligent city award for its smart transport system and
became one of the least congested major cities in the world. The success was led by the Singapore
government, who understood the importance of efficiency and affordable
transportation system (Reyes, 2013). Reyes remarks that the Singapore Land
Transport System Authority will further invest in transport infrastructure. In
my opinion, Singapore’s Ministry of Transport made the right decision to invest
in transport infrastructure so as to achieve “car-lite”. In this way, the
public would not have to rely on cars as they can take the public transport to
get from one place to another conveniently.
Additionally, Singapore’s skills in green buildings
were featured in prestige multi-national expansions called the Sino - Singapore
Tianjin Eco City. In June 2013, the Building and Construction Authority (BCA)
became the first government agency outside North America and Europe to obtain
the Alliance to Save Energy’s International Star Award. On top of that, BCA’s dedication
and leadership in green building development was reflected in other global accolades
such as World Green Building Council’s Government Leadership Award and Aspen
Institute Energy and Environment (Government) Award. (BCA website, n.d.).
In conclusion, I strongly believe that Singapore government
plays an important role by setting the first step in sustainable development. The
Singapore government should be transparent, open to sustainable ideas and
responsible. Not only do infrastructure engineers need to think about an
improved approach for infrastructure, they need to communicate to the citizens
about what sustainable development can bring to a society. Therefore, I feel
that the government can help to convey and convince the public for a good
change.
Moreover, the government can implement a
certification system whereby companies all over the world would need to fulfill
international standards on sustainable development. One example is the Green
Mark, a rating tool made by the BCA to ensure buildings are environmental
friendly. This also could coincide with what Cho had emphasized in her article that
both the government and private sector need to be equipped and capable to
evaluate sustainable infrastructure development using systems such as the
Envision Rating System.
References:
Building
and Construction Authority. (n.d.). Leading the way for green buildings in the
tropics. Retrieved from
https://www.bca.gov.sg/greenmark/others/sg_green_buildings_tropics.pdf
https://www.bca.gov.sg/greenmark/others/sg_green_buildings_tropics.pdf
Cho,H.
(2014). Developing sustainable infrastructure in new cities. New Cities Foundation. Retrieved from
http://www.newcitiesfoundation.org/evaluating-sustainable-infrastructure-development-new-cities/
http://www.newcitiesfoundation.org/evaluating-sustainable-infrastructure-development-new-cities/
Clark,H. (2013 March 13). Helen Clark: The importance of
governance for sustainable development.
United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from
Reyes,E. (2013 September 9). Singapore,Tokyo among top ten best
cities for urban sustainability. Eco-Business.
Retrieved from
http://www.eco-business.com/news/singapore-tokyo-among-top-ten-best-cities-urban-sustainability/
http://www.eco-business.com/news/singapore-tokyo-among-top-ten-best-cities-urban-sustainability/
Legrand. (n.d.). Sustainable
development. Retrieved from
http://www.legrand.com/EN/sustainable-development-description_12847.html
http://www.legrand.com/EN/sustainable-development-description_12847.html
Hi Siti,
ReplyDeleteVery nice article, I think it must be me, but I can't see the link to Singapore clearly.
Something to take note, in the last sentence, I believe that even though the word 'to' can be used as a preposition, it is not a preposition when used with a verb, and it is part of the to-infinitive form of a verb. It could be rephrased to 'capable of evaluating'.
Again, nice article and i enjoyed re-reading it.
Cheers mate!
Nate